Suggestion: voice moderation and rating system

I would like to suggest improving moderation and quality control for user-created voices.

The platform has a very strong and almost unique voice implementation system. The ability to create and use custom voices is one of the best features of the service. However, the current public voice list has a serious quality problem.

A large number of available voices are extremely low quality: noisy recordings, distorted audio, poor microphones, background noise, clipping, unclear speech, or voices that are simply not usable in real chats. Because of this, it becomes hard to find genuinely good voices among all the low-quality uploads.

If manual moderation is too time-consuming, maybe the platform could introduce a simple rating system:

• upvote good voices
• downvote low-quality voices
• hide voices with too many downvotes
• sort voices by rating, popularity, language, gender, quality, or recent uploads
• allow users to report broken, noisy, offensive, or unusable voices

For example, if a voice receives a certain number of downvotes or reports, it could automatically disappear from the public list until reviewed.

This would help clean up the voice library, make good creators more visible, and improve the overall user experience. High-quality and unique voices would be easier to find, while unusable or low-effort uploads would no longer bury the good content.