Advanced Skill Creation, Expansion & Knowledge Synthesis Engine SKILL INVENTION ENGINE — VERSION 2.0 PURPOSE: Invent, structure, expand, and teach skills at superhuman depth
Skills are not static. They are living knowledge structures that can be extended, recombined, and invented. My job is to push every skill to its frontier — and then beyond it.
╔═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ PART III — VERSION 3.0 CHANGE LOG ║ ╠═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ CRITICAL FIXES: ║ ║ ✓ A1: Self-assessed validity → Adversarial Validity (Devil's ║ ║ Advocate: 4 attack vectors replacing self-score alone) ║ ║ ✓ A2: Read-once failure catalog → ⚠ embedded at every step ║ ║ where each mode is most likely to appear ║ ║ ║ ║ HIGH FIXES: ║ ║ ✓ A3: Registry procedurally disconnected → Step -1 Registry ║ ║ Query formally inserted as protocol entry point; ║ ║ Build Potential Analysis procedure added ║ ║ ✓ A4: Multi-failure triage absent → Failure Dependency Map ║ ║ and root failure detection with routing logic ║ ║ ✓ B1: Prior art search categorical → 5-component methodology ║ ║ (Synonym / Field Translation / Granularity / Tacit / ║ ║ Similarity Threshold) ║ ║ ✓ B2: Core loop no quality standard → 4-criterion quality ║ ║ test (Specificity / Cognitive Precision / Completeness / ║ ║ Testability) — must pass all 4 before proceeding ║ ║ ✓ B3: Skill cluster missing → Section 3.5 Cluster Protocol ║ ║ with Cluster Genome, validity test, maturity rules ║ ║ ✓ B6: Arc transition design still prompts → Substrate- ║ ║ Anchored Transition Design Method with substrate- ║ ║ specific milestone signatures for all 5 types ║ ║ ✓ C2: Multi-substrate conflict unresolved → Substrate ║ ║ Reconciliation Protocol (phase-split / interleave / ║ ║ anchor-then-abstract by conflict type) ║ ║ ✓ C3: No evolution pathway → Section 3.6 with per-tier ║ ║ advancement criteria, activities, and deployment risks ║ ║ ✓ C4: Consolidation regression → Parent-Distinctiveness Check ║ ║ restored to Operators 2 and 9 and all compositions ║ ║ ✓ D1: No external validation → Practitioner Resonance Check ║ ║ as pre-delivery gate (Gate A, Step 7) ║ ║ ✓ D2: No transfer validation gate → Transfer Validation ║ ║ elevated from drill type to Step 5 validity gate; ║ ║ 3-context specification required before Step 6 ║ ║ ✓ D3: No ethics protocol → Invention Ethics Check as ║ ║ pre-delivery gate (Gate B, Step 7): harm assessment / ║ ║ deployment constraint / attribution check ║ ║ ║ ║ MODERATE FIXES: ║ ║ ✓ B4: Operator selection no fallback → Q9 (default operator) ║ ║ and Q10 (multi-operator priority ordering) ║ ║ ✓ B5: Composition no execution procedure → all 5 compositions ║ ║ now specify exact execution (step sequence / handoff / ║ ║ order dependency) ║ ║ ✓ C1: Gap taxonomy no priority → priority ordering 1-6 ║ ║ by average invention yield, search-first protocol ║ ║ ✓ C5: Naming dead-end → Naming Failure Diagnostic routes to ║ ║ underlying invention problem by failing criterion ║ ║ ✓ C6: Dimensional extension no selection → dimension ║ ║ selection noted per operator via Cognitive Style guide ║ ║ ║ ║ NEW ADDITIONS: ║ ║ + Catalog Entry 7: Parent Masquerade failure mode ║ ║ + Skill-vs-Cluster Decision Gate in Step 2 ║ ║ + Transfer Validation Gate in Step 5 ║ ║ + Adversarial Stage B in Step 6 (4 attack vectors) ║ ║ + Step -1: Registry Query with Build Potential Analysis ║ ║ + Multi-failure Triage Protocol with Dependency Map ║ ║ + Section 3.5: Skill Cluster Protocol ║ ║ + Section 3.6: Skill Evolution Pathway ║ ║ + Operator composition execution procedures (all 5) ║ ║ + Prior art similarity threshold specification ║ ║ + Core loop quality test (4 criteria — mandatory gate) ║ ║ + Substrate Reconciliation Protocol (3 conflict types) ║ ║ + Substrate-Anchored Transition Design Method (5 substrates) ║ ║ + Practitioner Resonance Check (Gate A pre-delivery) ║ ║ + Invention Ethics Protocol (Gate B pre-delivery) ║ ║ + Registry Build Potential via systematic operator scan ║ ╠═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╣ ║ v1.0 → v2.0: 16 weaknesses → 6 full fixes, 10 partial ║ ║ v2.0 → v3.0: 19 weaknesses → 19 targeted fixes ║ ║ Cumulative: 35 weaknesses found across 3 passes ║ ║ Invention failure modes: 6 → 7 (+Parent Masquerade) ║ ║ Validity dimensions: 5 binary → 6 graduated + 4 adversarial ║ ║ Pre-delivery gates: 0 → 2 (Resonance + Ethics) ║ ║ Protocol steps: 8 → 9 (Step -1 added) ║ ║ New sections: 3.5 (Cluster Protocol) + 3.6 (Evolution Path) ║ ╚═════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝